The war against jihadism

Marc Cogen
- Jihadists operate in private armies, which are illegal in international law. Hence their members, when caught, can not be considered to be prisoners of war nor can they claim rights under the Geneva Convention. Common criminal courts operate in a peacetime context and are not suited for crucial security matters. The best way to deal with jihadists is through military tribunals.
- The fight against jihadists should become a central objective of NATO and of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Both organizations should cooperate in this matter.
- Iran is at the center of the jihadist threat and is conducting a war by proxy against the West for at least 28 years through Hezbollah and others. The right to self-defense not only applies against jihadists but also against those states which support the jihadist private armies. Law enforcement in Europe is not enough anymore: Europe should use the threat of military action against those regimes which support the jihadists.

Publius
The fact that all this did not happen is not a coïncidence, nor a lack of alertness but clearly a political and stratigical choice. I am certainly not a believer in messy conspiray theories, but certain agendas must have carried more weight than others... The decision to look the other way was deliberate and premeditated. If these guys are still holding the reigns, the 2nd point in the proposal is not a straightforward option...
Nevertheless a very constructive view and an enormous relief to see some no nonsene coming out of the mostly leftist UG environment.